John Adams lived long enough to see his son become president in 1825, but he died before John Quincy Adams lost the presidency to Andrew Jackson in 1828. Fortunately, that meant he didn't have to witness what many historians consider the nastiest contest in American history.
The slurs flew back and forth, with John Quincy Adams being labeled a pimp, and Andrew Jackson's wife getting called a slut.
As the election progressed, editorials in the American newspapers read more like bathroom graffiti than political commentary. One paper reported that "General Jackson's mother was a common prostitute, brought to this country by the British soldiers! She afterward married a mulatto man, with whom she had several children, of which number General Jackson is one!"
What got Americans so fired up? For one thing, many voters felt John Quincy Adams should never have been president in the first place. During the election of 1824, Jackson had won the popular vote, but not the electoral vote, so the election was decided by the House of Representatives. Henry Clay, one of the other candidates running for president, threw his support behind Adams. To return the favor, Adams promptly made him secretary of state. Jackson's supporters labeled it "The Corrupt Bargain" and spent the next four years calling Adams a usurper.
Beyond getting the short end of the electoral stick, Andrew Jackson managed to connect with voters via his background -- which couldn't have been more different than Adams'.
By the time John Quincy was 15, he'd traveled extensively in Europe, mastered several languages, and worked as a translator in the court of Catherine the Great.
Meanwhile, Andrew Jackson had none of those privileges. By 15, he'd been kidnapped and beaten by British soldiers, orphaned, and left to fend for himself on the streets of South Carolina.
Adams was a Harvard-educated diplomat from a prominent New England family. Jackson was a humble war hero from the rural South who'd never learned to spell. He was the first presidential candidate in American history to really sell himself as a man of the people, and the people loved him for it.
Having been denied their candidate in 1824, the masses were up in arms for Jackson four years later. And though his lack of education and political experience terrified many Adams supporters, that argument didn't hold water for the throngs who lined up to cast their votes for "Old Hickory."
Ever since Jackson's decisive victory, no presidential candidate has dared take a step toward the White House without first holding hands with the common man.
Thoughts on this one??

14 comments:
everyone should try to represent the common person, i think that is a good thing that happenned, without the hardworking comman man our country would be nowhere
I'm pretty surprised that they used the words pimp and slut back then, crazy! But I think its awesome that Jackson, was just a normal guy that wants something good for this country and not a spoiled rich brat that thinks he better than us, just cause he is shot up with botox, 80 and has no hair. And the common man is better than them anyday! So I love Jackson. :D
agreed.
I thinks its crazy that politics were just as full of crap as they are now.
and its a great thing that now presidential candidates are trying to relate to the people.
after all we are the reason they'd be in office.
That is crazy how people can just label others like that a pimp, slut, prostitute that is extremely vaguer and rude. That's just wrong.
i think jackson was a good man. he did alot for our country and he was not one to let his ego get away form him. he was a honest hard working man
I don't know why would the past would effect today company.
i think it is in apropirate for canadates to be calling each other stuff like "pimp" and "slut".
That's cool that Jackson was a people's man. Adams seemed like the typical spoiled rich kid who was given everything without having to work hard for it. For having such "inexperience"(ring any bells?) Jackson did a fine job in the White House.
This just shows that politics don't change. There is always going to be name calling and one person bringing the other person down. In the end i think the person who is most relatable will win.
Grumble Grumble Grumble...
There has been a whole lot of candidates who win the popular votes, but not the electoral. And whit the slut thing and pimp thing that was dumb, but then again that was way back before our time thi8ngs were different back then.
Andrew wanted something good for the country.
im just shocked that they would use those words back then. i mean weren't those supposed to be the good old days.
The popular vote/ electoral vote things are dumb, I can imagine why someone would be mad about that. Its good that candidates try to relate to the people though.
Post a Comment